Write the graded report summary
Objectives
Encode a decision-ready summary from F01, F02 and O01. Record evidence, requirements, risk, owners, dates and the limits of the conclusion.
Use the exact case labels in the fixture. The field checks validate this structured record, not the full quality of an audit or an external assurance opinion.
Approved case requirements
{
"summary": {
"conclusion": "emergency CDE change review is not effective",
"sample_tested": 18,
"population": 120,
"statistical_inference": false,
"grants_certification": false
},
"F01": {
"grade": "major",
"evidence": [
"E01-E12",
"workflow lacks review gate"
],
"criteria": [
"internal two-business-day rule",
"PCI DSS 6.5",
"ISO 20000-1 8.5.1"
],
"risk": "unreviewed payment changes",
"owner": "payments operations director",
"due": "2026-04-30"
},
"F02": {
"grade": "minor",
"evidence": "H07 missing independent approval",
"criterion": "internal independent-approval procedure",
"risk": "unauthorized hosting change",
"owner": "hosting service manager",
"due": "2026-05-07"
},
"O01": {
"grade": "observation",
"evidence": "recovery objectives met and contacts verified",
"suggestion": "group roster by recovery role"
},
"followup": {
"F01_subsequent_changes": 5,
"F01_review_business_days": 2,
"independent_verifier": true,
"overdue_major_to": "audit committee",
"require_original_corrections": true
}
}
Checks the server runs (5)
- State conclusion and sampling limits
- Trace the systemic finding
- Trace the isolated finding
- Keep improvement distinct from nonconformity
- Specify verification and escalation
Check names are all you see here: the expectations that decide pass or fail, and the reference solution, stay on the server.
Step-by-step hints
The guided walkthrough, in full. It is free: no XP cost, and it does not touch the paid hint ladder or the reveal gate.
- Step 1
State conclusion and sampling limits
Transfer the relevant case facts from the fixture into these fields. Compare each assertion with the scope, evidence and engagement rules before submission.
State conclusion and sampling limits
- Step 2
Trace the systemic finding
Transfer the relevant case facts from the fixture into these fields. Compare each assertion with the scope, evidence and engagement rules before submission.
Trace the systemic finding
- Step 3
Trace the isolated finding
Transfer the relevant case facts from the fixture into these fields. Compare each assertion with the scope, evidence and engagement rules before submission.
Trace the isolated finding
- Step 4
Keep improvement distinct from nonconformity
Transfer the relevant case facts from the fixture into these fields. Compare each assertion with the scope, evidence and engagement rules before submission.
Keep improvement distinct from nonconformity
- Step 5
Specify verification and escalation
Transfer the relevant case facts from the fixture into these fields. Compare each assertion with the scope, evidence and engagement rules before submission.
Specify verification and escalation
Rules summary
XP on pass
60 bonus XP the first time every check goes green.
Paid hints
1 available. Each costs 25% of the lab XP (about 15 XP).
Reveal solution
Scores 0 XP and unlocks only after 3 check runs.
Attempt cap
60 check runs per learner. The runner warns you in the last 10.
Drafts
Your editor content is saved in this browser, so a reload will not lose work.
Walkthrough
Always free and never penalised: use it before spending a hint.
