Review lab 40 bonus XP

Judge draft findings for quality

Objectives

Judge each independent draft against the same test results. A finding needs an applicable criterion and evidence. Do not invent incidents, extrapolate beyond the sample or prescribe a vendor. Accept a bounded finding without requiring a proven incident.

Verdicts are accept or reject. Every rejection needs one reason code from: unsupported-incident | invalid-extrapolation | missing-criterion | prescribed-solution.

Draft report review

Q-1 | IAM-04 v3 requires removal within 24 hours. Of 8 privileged departures tested, 2 took 72 and 96 hours (EV-17, EV-18), exposing continued access. Minor under the agreed bounded-lapse rule.
Q-2 | Two late removals prove that departed staff stole customer records.
Q-3 | Two of 8 privileged removals were late, therefore exactly 25 percent of all company departures failed.
Q-4 | Improve security because our auditor prefers a different dashboard. No requirement or unmet criterion is identified.
Q-5 | REC-02 v2 requires recovery within 4 hours. DR-04 took 6 hours (EV-24); 3 other exercises met target. Minor lapse creates availability exposure.
Q-6 | To close F-01 management must buy the auditor's preferred product; alternative effective actions will be rejected.

Checks the server runs (3)

  • Every line in the fixture carries a verdict
  • Accept and reject land on the right lines
  • Each rejection cites a valid reason code

Check names are all you see here: the expectations that decide pass or fail, and the reference solution, stay on the server.

Step-by-step hints

The guided walkthrough, in full. It is free: no XP cost, and it does not touch the paid hint ladder or the reveal gate.

  1. Step 1

    Read the request before the artefact

    Read each draft as a separate claim against the same working papers.

  2. Step 2

    Judge every line, including the boring ones

    Judge every draft, including defensible ones, once.

    Every line in the fixture carries a verdict

  3. Step 3

    Separate what is wrong from what is merely ugly

    Look for a traceable unmet requirement and keep conclusions within the tested boundary.

    Accept and reject land on the right lines

  4. Step 4

    Say why, in the vocabulary the programme uses

    Choose the single defect that best explains rejection: invented harm, invalid population inference, absent criterion or imposed implementation.

    Each rejection cites a valid reason code

Rules summary

  • XP on pass

    40 bonus XP the first time every check goes green.

  • Paid hints

    1 available. Each costs 25% of the lab XP (about 10 XP).

  • Reveal solution

    Scores 0 XP and unlocks only after 3 check runs.

  • Attempt cap

    60 check runs per learner. The runner warns you in the last 10.

  • Drafts

    Your editor content is saved in this browser, so a reload will not lose work.

  • Walkthrough

    Always free and never penalised: use it before spending a hint.