Judge draft findings for quality
Objectives
Judge each independent draft against the same test results. A finding needs an applicable criterion and evidence. Do not invent incidents, extrapolate beyond the sample or prescribe a vendor. Accept a bounded finding without requiring a proven incident.
Verdicts are accept or reject. Every rejection needs one reason code from: unsupported-incident | invalid-extrapolation | missing-criterion | prescribed-solution.
Draft report review
Q-1 | IAM-04 v3 requires removal within 24 hours. Of 8 privileged departures tested, 2 took 72 and 96 hours (EV-17, EV-18), exposing continued access. Minor under the agreed bounded-lapse rule. Q-2 | Two late removals prove that departed staff stole customer records. Q-3 | Two of 8 privileged removals were late, therefore exactly 25 percent of all company departures failed. Q-4 | Improve security because our auditor prefers a different dashboard. No requirement or unmet criterion is identified. Q-5 | REC-02 v2 requires recovery within 4 hours. DR-04 took 6 hours (EV-24); 3 other exercises met target. Minor lapse creates availability exposure. Q-6 | To close F-01 management must buy the auditor's preferred product; alternative effective actions will be rejected.
Checks the server runs (3)
- Every line in the fixture carries a verdict
- Accept and reject land on the right lines
- Each rejection cites a valid reason code
Check names are all you see here: the expectations that decide pass or fail, and the reference solution, stay on the server.
Step-by-step hints
The guided walkthrough, in full. It is free: no XP cost, and it does not touch the paid hint ladder or the reveal gate.
- Step 1
Read the request before the artefact
Read each draft as a separate claim against the same working papers.
- Step 2
Judge every line, including the boring ones
Judge every draft, including defensible ones, once.
Every line in the fixture carries a verdict
- Step 3
Separate what is wrong from what is merely ugly
Look for a traceable unmet requirement and keep conclusions within the tested boundary.
Accept and reject land on the right lines
- Step 4
Say why, in the vocabulary the programme uses
Choose the single defect that best explains rejection: invented harm, invalid population inference, absent criterion or imposed implementation.
Each rejection cites a valid reason code
Rules summary
XP on pass
40 bonus XP the first time every check goes green.
Paid hints
1 available. Each costs 25% of the lab XP (about 10 XP).
Reveal solution
Scores 0 XP and unlocks only after 3 check runs.
Attempt cap
60 check runs per learner. The runner warns you in the last 10.
Drafts
Your editor content is saved in this browser, so a reload will not lose work.
Walkthrough
Always free and never penalised: use it before spending a hint.
